an excerpt from my jounal on Sunday, June 21st:
—————————————–
I’m reading through the Epistles of Paul and two things are striking me like never before: Paul’s 1) anti-religion rhetoric and 2) his talk of universal reconciliation. That this strikes me as anything novel I suppose testifies to the hermeneutical glasses we bring to the table, based on where we are at in our lives.
First, the apostle is scathing with his anti-religion rhetoric. Now it’s so cliché in Christianist world today to say “It’s not a religion; it’s a relationship.” But almost always, the very same person who will say this will have set-in-stone rules for religion, hard political beliefs that tie into it, and very certain opinions about who is in and who is out. It’s a “relationship” that at the very least indistinguishable from religion. Secondly, Paul really flirts with language of “All things” being reconciled. It’s even there in Ephesians 1, a clobber passage used by some to insist that God picks only some for salvation and excludes the rest from welcome. And yet even with the apostle flirty with such loose all-things-reconciled language, I tensed up last night as I was polishing up a song I wrote with a line about God feeling alone when he alone believes both in himself and the salvation of the world (whereas Christians tend to believe only the first and agnostics only the latter). I feel the same dissonance whenever I make even a quick comment about God reconciling everything.
I often wonder how long it will be until I speak more openly with such Biblical-yet-uncomfortable language. Quoting the apostle Paul, without making all sorts of qualifications about what his rhetoric could mean, can quickly make people question your Christianity.
Libby just added that maybe the relation turmoil I’ve had recently, with several people I’ve loved and respected, has its way of showing me a religion in which there is no “right thing to do,” where rules for how to fix things break down. And more importantly, it shows me what God feels when we firmly refuse to reconcile. And in the same way that allowing interpersonal dissyncronization causes all sorts of unwanted things, maybe the Spirit’s judgment of disintegrating sin is simply letting us have our way like a child ostracized by peers because he insists on breaking everyone else’s toy.
It’s fitting that the word I’ve been camping on lately is “reconciliation,” which Paul sees as central to the Gospel. But it’s not just reconciliation to God; we are terribly shortsighted when we stop at that. It’s about reconciling to God, to others, to the earth/world, and to ourselves. As much as I’d rather point this biting fact at anyone else, I have to turn it on myself and say that if there is any person I would refuse to reconcile with, I am not preaching a true Gospel. And I need to repent to specific people of the way that I let anger stop me from reconciling when someone apologizes. The ancient heresy of Gnosticism (which I say is very much alive in different form to this day) was rooted in the prioritizing of the spirit over the body, the sacred of the secular. Gospel calls for everything to move toward a state of reconciliation, and everything is sacred.
Grace and Peace
Posted by taddelay
Posted by taddelay 
